both are as good as each other if done properlyPlease dont use fish to cycle - even if they survive it their lives will be shortened. If you care about fish then fishless cycle.
fishless cycling is easier, but it gets me when people say its cruel and harms fish. you will only cause your fish harm if you dont do 4+ water changes a day. regardless of test results.
im not saying anybody is wrong. but IMO if you know what your doing then its a feasible option, but requires a 50% water change every 6 hours.
yep, hence if you know what your doing and how to do it properly.fishless cycling is easier, but it gets me when people say its cruel and harms fish. you will only cause your fish harm if you dont do 4+ water changes a day. regardless of test results.
im not saying anybody is wrong. but IMO if you know what your doing then its a feasible option, but requires a 50% water change every 6 hours.
Which a lot of new fish keepers don't realise and proberbly 90% of people can't do, especially overnight.
Most people are happy to do research but a lot of people also trust their lfs to give them the right advice. Sadly, this doesn't always happen.
People asking questions on a forum is researching, they'rs halfway there.
As for Andy, I'm certain that he set up a lot of his tanks by cloning.