aha 50 people have voted and it's time for commentary.
considering we're supposed to be concerned for fishes welfare i'm astounded by the 86% of voters eat fish!
How is that? Do you suppose all budgie fanciers lay off the roast chicken?
well it would make sense to wouldn't it? treating select animals favourably then consuming their "cousins" seems a smidge hypocritical.
It's what traditional communities have always been doing: breeding animals to eat, but making a pet of your horse and dog. Are all traditional farmers, indigenous rain forest people, African hunters hypocritical, because they eat meat but also keep pet dogs, pigs etc. Eating meat to them is about survival; you don't have to hate an animal to eat it. In fact, traditional societies, such as the Indians and the Sami, always used to feel a special relationship to the animals they hunted.
A lot of people on this forum keep fish-eating fish. Is that hypocritical, too? My guppies consume their young; I doubt they would be very shocked at my pilchard sandwich. In fact, if you check out the label of your flake food you will almost certainly find you are using fish products to feed your fish.
Are all dog-keepers and cat-keepers hypocritical unless they make the poor things live off lettuce (which in my book would count as animal cruelty).
In my case, I spent part of my childhood on a bare rocky island where fish and potatoes was what there was to eat. My parents were dead keen on the environment and refused to hear of importing exotic vegetables from abroad instead of eating local food.
Since I moved to England I eat a lot more veg because that is so easily available from local sources (such as my allotment). I certainly try to avoid eating threatened species (no cod for me), but would feel a lot more comfortable with a lamb chop from a local hill pasture (where beans wouldn't grow anyway without serious damage to the environment) than I would eating an apple imported from South Africa. As a member of the RSPB, I know how vital pastures are for the survival of local wildlife. I also know how sterile great vegetable fields tend to be.
So you see, people may make different choices from yours, and still make them for moral and caring reasons. If I were you I wouldn't assume that you are the first person ever to have thought through these issues: in fact, the question comes up on this board with tedious regularity (I'd say about once a month), which explains why posters are putting less and less energy into explaining their reasoning.