modaz
Getting old, but nowhere near knackered, i just lo
i sent this letter off and heres the reply i got,
Thankyou very much for your letter of 26 June 2007 to Ben Bradshaw enclosing a copy of an e-mail from your constituent ********** who resides at**************about the dying of tropical fish. I am replying as the minister resposible for this policy area.
We are not aware that the practice of dying fish occurs in this country (uk). If this practice were to be carried out in England or Wales then it is possible that it may amount to an act of animal cruelty or a failure to enclose an animals welfare, and a prosecution could be taken under the Animal Welfare Act 2006.
The Act, which came into force in England on 6th April (and in Wales on 27th March)2007, also makes it an offence to mutilate an animal. The Act allows, by regulation, certain mutilations to be exempted from this prohibition where there are sound welfare or good management reasons to do so. The Mutilations (permitted Procedures)(England) Regulations 2007 came into force on 6th April and while the dying of a fish by injection or tattoo would be regarded as a mutilation it is not a practice which we consider merited an exemption from the overall prohibition.
As the report in your constituent's letter mentions, there are no plans at present to introduce a ban on the sale of dyed fish in this country under the Animal Welfare Act. The Act allows us to introduce new regulations which would cover pet vending. This would be the appropiate place to consider whether any regulations are necessary to cover the sale of dyed fish.
this letter was a copy of the reply that Jeff Rooker ( Minister for Sustainable Farming an Food, and Animal Welfare) sent Sir John Butterfill FRICS MP.
_______________________________________________________
a letter that came with this copy from john Butterfill states that there is no plans to by the government to introduce a ban of selling dyed fish in the UK but they are proposing to introduce new regulations which might cover restrictions on the sale of dyed fish and that prosecutions could be taken out under the Animal Welfare Act for people who encourage the need for dyed fish.
Thankyou very much for your letter of 26 June 2007 to Ben Bradshaw enclosing a copy of an e-mail from your constituent ********** who resides at**************about the dying of tropical fish. I am replying as the minister resposible for this policy area.
We are not aware that the practice of dying fish occurs in this country (uk). If this practice were to be carried out in England or Wales then it is possible that it may amount to an act of animal cruelty or a failure to enclose an animals welfare, and a prosecution could be taken under the Animal Welfare Act 2006.
The Act, which came into force in England on 6th April (and in Wales on 27th March)2007, also makes it an offence to mutilate an animal. The Act allows, by regulation, certain mutilations to be exempted from this prohibition where there are sound welfare or good management reasons to do so. The Mutilations (permitted Procedures)(England) Regulations 2007 came into force on 6th April and while the dying of a fish by injection or tattoo would be regarded as a mutilation it is not a practice which we consider merited an exemption from the overall prohibition.
As the report in your constituent's letter mentions, there are no plans at present to introduce a ban on the sale of dyed fish in this country under the Animal Welfare Act. The Act allows us to introduce new regulations which would cover pet vending. This would be the appropiate place to consider whether any regulations are necessary to cover the sale of dyed fish.
this letter was a copy of the reply that Jeff Rooker ( Minister for Sustainable Farming an Food, and Animal Welfare) sent Sir John Butterfill FRICS MP.
_______________________________________________________
a letter that came with this copy from john Butterfill states that there is no plans to by the government to introduce a ban of selling dyed fish in the UK but they are proposing to introduce new regulations which might cover restrictions on the sale of dyed fish and that prosecutions could be taken out under the Animal Welfare Act for people who encourage the need for dyed fish.