andywg
Bored into leaving
The trouble with having lenses and collimaters on these is that then you see the individual beams going through the water which I don't want. I want even spread. If you do want collimators/lense/reflectors then they are cheap from the same source as the LEDs here:
[URL="http/cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...A:IT&ih=023"]http/cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...A:IT&ih=023[/URL]
My point was not so much at your situation and was aimed at Barney who is thinking of these in a reef setting where the light is more important than it is in a planted setting. With the correct lenses and the right amount of LEDs you don't see the individual beams and you do get decent penetration, but even then it is not as good as s decent MH bulb. Now I don't know of that many people who would ever really consider a 400W MH necessary to cover a 2x2x2 cube of FW planted, but in the upper ends of SPS reef keeping it is far from uncommon.
At the moment most people compare the performances of the LEDs to 250W MH bulbs and the DIY ones fall a way short of the professional ones (as you might expect) which in turn fall short of the MH. In a FW planted scenario you are probably not comparing the LEDs to such high output lighting and I dare say what you have will serve you very well.
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.