Thanks Byron.Your observation in post #11 tally with mine, and the accepted "knowledge" of the hobby. It has been noted by several advocates of "soil" substrates that the benefit is in the first year, namely the CO2 and ammonia produced by the decomposition of organics in the soil. After roughly 12 months, these people tend to agree that any inert substrate such as sand will be as good--Diana Walstad even states this in some of her articles.
The problem with this initial production of ammonia and CO2 is the effect on the fish. Which is why so many of these people recommend a dry start, and no fish in the tank for six months. This allows the tank to stabilize. Given that thereafter you are really no better off plant-wise than with sand, it rather proves why this is more of a problem than benefit.
Flourite nearly killed my group of cories, and within just a couple days. When I saw bleeding mouths I removed them to a tank with play sand, and they fortunately recovered, and I still have them some 8-9 years later.
As I mentioned in my reply (#15), I really just have to plead ignorance lol
The soil seemed like a good idea at the time because I got excited about having a planted tank. The Aquarium employee sold me some power sand to put under the soil so I didn't have to do a complete clean out after a year, but I never really researched what would happen after that (He told me that the sand would be too fine for the plants to grow through well enough). I guess being new to the hobby I just sort of accepted it as gospel.
I didn't put any fish in the tank at the beginning and waited for it to stabilise for a few months but lately, starting to realise the difficulties that come along with not being able to do a gravel vacuum and realising that a lot of 'tank cleaning' fish aren't compatible with the aqua soil, so I definitely wish I did more research before jumping in, but I guess that the trial and error is half of the fun haha.
Anyways I definitely appreciate all the help, I for sure need it
Last edited: