Best External Filter?

The February FOTM Contest Poll is open!
FishForums.net Fish of the Month
🏆 Click to vote! 🏆

Do yourself a favor and don't waste your money on anything that says tetratec on the box. They're better used for decorating the inside of trash receptacles.

Can't go wrong with an Eheim classic of you're on a budget. No bells and whistles, just a good basic workhorse canister. Otherwise look into the eheim pro series. Also, eheims wet/dry canisters will provide great biological filtration, but they will cost a but more.
 
I think I went for a Prof II 2026 eheim cannister. Plenty overfiltered, with drilled holes in the outlet to slow down the flow a bit.

Squid

2026 would still leave the 180l plenty under filtered. 600-650lph (estimated flow) giving, at best, 3x flow


I disagree. The 2026 is recommended for a 350 litre tank, and this is a 180 litre tank. My stats have been perfect, the water extremely clear and the flow had to be dispersed to not whip the tank up into a whirlpool.

2026 has:

# Pump Output: 950 l/h
# Filter Circulation: 650 l/h

so it is filtering the entire tank 3.6 times per hour.


What makes you think that is not enough? I have had great results with that filter, which is how I am measuring it's applicability.

Edit: i'm not necessarily doubting you, i'm just interested in how your view differs from the eheim recommendation as my experience with this filter has been great. :)

Squid
 
I think I went for a Prof II 2026 eheim cannister. Plenty overfiltered, with drilled holes in the outlet to slow down the flow a bit.

Squid

2026 would still leave the 180l plenty under filtered. 600-650lph (estimated flow) giving, at best, 3x flow


I disagree. The 2026 is recommended for a 350 litre tank, and this is a 180 litre tank. My stats have been perfect, the water extremely clear and the flow had to be dispersed to not whip the tank up into a whirlpool.

2026 has:

# Pump Output: 950 l/h
# Filter Circulation: 650 l/h

so it is filtering the entire tank 3.6 times per hour.


What makes you think that is not enough? I have had great results with that filter, which is how I am measuring it's applicability.

Edit: i'm not necessarily doubting you, i'm just interested in how your view differs from the eheim recommendation as my experience with this filter has been great. :)

Squid

It depends on the stocking but some people me included like to go more than 5x turn over an hour:) I've got around 4350LPH on 450litre tank giving it nearly 10x the turnover an hour but i have quite a few fish that eat high protien food and give off alot of waste therefore need good filteration.
 
Thanks.. My tank is an understocked community tank, with just the BN plec as the messiest. The others are just tetras and pentazonas plus 3 rainbowfish.

I guess I will keep it to non messy community fish and no jumping into mbunas just yet ;)

rickster- I guess it depends on the fish you keep, but for a little more future proofing ignore the eheim recommendations and listen to these chaps. :)


Always learning,
Squid
 
Hi,

I have a Juwel Rio 180 with the standard internal filter (600 powerhead), I am thinking of going to an external filter as I feel they offer better results? Could anyone tell me if this is the case, and which would be the best one to go for, both cost wise and reliability/quietness.



Many thanks

Rich

Honestly, almost anything will be better. the Eheim pro 2, better still pro 3. but, on a budget, 2x tetra ex1200's will do.


crikey what you filtering?? :blink:

i have a rio 180l and run a tetratec ex1200 WITH NO ISSUES.

its nice and quiet, rund efficently and does its job.

BUT if i had my way, i would have an eheim pro II, or better, a pro III. or if you have money to burn, a pro thermal!
 
Hi,

I have a Juwel Rio 180 with the standard internal filter (600 powerhead), I am thinking of going to an external filter as I feel they offer better results? Could anyone tell me if this is the case, and which would be the best one to go for, both cost wise and reliability/quietness.



Many thanks

Rich

Honestly, almost anything will be better. the Eheim pro 2, better still pro 3. but, on a budget, 2x tetra ex1200's will do.


crikey what you filtering?? :blink:

i have a rio 180l and run a tetratec ex1200 WITH NO ISSUES.

its nice and quiet, rund efficently and does its job.

BUT if i had my way, i would have an eheim pro II, or better, a pro III. or if you have money to burn, a pro thermal!

For the price of the teratec 1200's you might as well buy two as theyre cheap as chips now:)
 
depends if you go new or second hand.

I paid £100 new and £35 second hand!!

i had two on my 260l. but instead of two ex1200 what about a 2400? (admittedly i prefer two 1200's, one each side and one is a back up)
 
Hi,

I have a Juwel Rio 180 with the standard internal filter (600 powerhead), I am thinking of going to an external filter as I feel they offer better results? Could anyone tell me if this is the case, and which would be the best one to go for, both cost wise and reliability/quietness.



Many thanks

Rich

Honestly, almost anything will be better. the Eheim pro 2, better still pro 3. but, on a budget, 2x tetra ex1200's will do.


crikey what you filtering?? :blink:

i have a rio 180l and run a tetratec ex1200 WITH NO ISSUES.

its nice and quiet, rund efficently and does its job.

BUT if i had my way, i would have an eheim pro II, or better, a pro III. or if you have money to burn, a pro thermal!

just an ordinary tank with, mid stocking. 5x is a baseline. over the twelve months between cleans, the flow drops to about 4x. but, if you over feed, it drops much quicker.

as most of those who do it (5x plus flow) will attest, there is a vast and noticeable difference if you can manage it. 5x is not a "some people like too". its been around for many years. with average stocking 5x flow is the most efficient way for your bio colony thrive. (true there is more to it. but the flow is the framework)
I know its expensive (two filters as opposed to one). but if you are in it to do it on the cheap. this is the wrong hobby!

the funniest thing is people imagining a 600lph jewel item (on a 180) is of any use. even juwel say it is for a lightly stocked planted tank.(thats a few guppies and well planted to, translate) upping the power to 1000lph, only makes things worse. even better is the fact that, jewel say, they dont work till the flow is much reduced. in effect there is not enough bio area, for the flow of the pump.

to be fair, i was shocked when i started looking into this. needing the best part of £200 worth of filters on a 180l, seemed mad. but, as the idea is to keep your fish happy and healthy, how can you refuse?

WITH NO ISSUES
as far as you are aware. unless you have tried personally, for any length of time. how would you know? you need to experience both to make such an evaluation.
 
to be fair, i was shocked when i started looking into this. needing the best part of £200 worth of filters on a 180l, seemed mad. but, as the idea is to keep your fish happy and healthy, how can you refuse?


Agreed. Hence my last comment.

I guess my experience has been just fine due to light stocking and non-messy fish.

I was looking at the rena tanks recently, and the filters they provide really vary in ability when looking at the flow agains the tank size. Do you know if the rena filters are any good, as the tanks are often highly recommended.

Cheers,
Squid
 
Member oldman47 runs Rena filters and likes them very much. From his and other members comments they seem to be very good filters.

The level of maintenance that hobbyists give their filters can vary quite a bit I believe. There's going to be a difference between people who use the right brushes to clean their impeller and lube all their seals and brush out their hoses during monthly maintenance versus people who simply squeeze out the sponge and clip the lid back on.

From the above posts I'll comment that one should potentially steer clear of the Eheim thermo versions. The sensors have a problem if any salt is ever used in the tank (not that I'm advocating ever using salt, but the life of an eheim is long and things happen..) Better to go with the Hydor inlines if you want external heat. I'll also repeat my comment that from my reading here, there seem to be a very small percentage of TTecs that have cracking plastic problems but for the vast majority of members reporting, the TTecs are doing fine and saving them some money, so its more a risk thing than an across the board quality issue you're likely to encounter.

WD
 
The Rena filters have been very reliable in my use but the Eheim also come highly recommended by other members. I have not used them so I can't properly judge them. The Fluval internals seem to be very nice filters but the externals do not have near as good a reputation as the internals. I have only tried the internals when it comes to Fluvals. The Tetra-tec filters look much like my Marineland filter C series and I suspect they are just the same filter sold under different names in different parts of the world. I am not impressed with my Marineland. It works great as a filter but is much harder to clean and prime than my Renas of a similar size are.
 
to be fair, i was shocked when i started looking into this. needing the best part of £200 worth of filters on a 180l, seemed mad. but, as the idea is to keep your fish happy and healthy, how can you refuse?


Agreed. Hence my last comment.

I guess my experience has been just fine due to light stocking and non-messy fish.

I was looking at the rena tanks recently, and the filters they provide really vary in ability when looking at the flow agains the tank size. Do you know if the rena filters are any good, as the tanks are often highly recommended.

Cheers,
Squid

I cant speak for Rena filters. as the experience, i have, is bad. however, this flies in the face of, accumulated, experience here. anyway, one of my filters is a Hydor prime 30, not one of the filters most would think of as a "top brand". yet it has worked, faultlessly, for over 1/2 a decade. until the impeller broke, just a week or so ago. (all fixed for a tenner).

if you are really interested in this subject, do some forum searches. go back at least 2 years. the posts, recently, have been showing "myopia". consistently ignoring, and often contradicting the experience built up since the forum started (one reason for the dearth of "truly" experienced, long term members here, nowadays)

ultimately, you can only speak from experience. so if you have spent your life with sponge filters. you will know and trust them. however, even a MOD, can not extrapolate that, to externals/internals or sumps. those who, try to, fail miserably!

I'm with WD, on the Eheim thermos. i have heard bad things about their Wet and Dry too. (never used one so cant say). early Pro3's were also prone to failure. (something to do with the electronics)
apart from clogging. i have come across no failed (leaks/cracks) Tetras (they do flow a lot less, for their claimed power, than other peoples though)
avoid Fluval, even the new ones (g) except the FX5 (one of the best).
avoid Chinese filters too. indeed some work. but they break and no parts are available. £45 is cheap for an external. but not if you need a new one next year!

Aqua one have a good rep (again i have no experience).

I started with a Juwel 600 unit. and saw the appalling state of a 180l just running that. so in came the Hydor. it gave a massive improvement (both water clarity and fish health). i bought the Eheim (2224) to replace the Hydor. but having added it to the tank, in conjunction with the Hydor, i saw another increase in water clarity. and whilst the fish were no more healthy. they seemed more than happy with the extra flow. so i never removed the Hydor. the recent impeller problem underlined the benefits. i saw an immediate drop in water quality. another thing about higher flow or 2 filter systems is, cleaning. my Hydor gets cleaned every 9 months or so. the Eheim went 13 months between cleans last time. this means your intervention, in the environment, is much reduced. less work on the tank, means less work for you and less stress for the fish.
 
I switched from an Eheim to a Rena & have been delighted with it. I have a noticable improvement in the clarity of my water & find it's a no fuss product that just does the job well.
 
Alot more info to digest now!! I have looked at the Eheim classic range, however reading the comments made, which is the best filter to go for based on the filtration as it seems the the consensus is x5 per hour? I would like to make the right decsion based on filtration size first time, to ensure the best results. I think I will go for the Eheim, but need to know if the pro II is going to be right for my 180l tank??



Thanks

Rickster
 
I personally feel the Pro range is worth the extra penny over the classic but then I've not had a classic and acknowledge that the difference is probably more about convenience. The pro models are just so easy to maintain in terms of flipping off the hoses and carrying the box to the cleaning location.

I tried very hard, just like you, to understand ideal turnover recommendations but in the end its impossible to predict the future, even for yourself. After I had settled in to 5x being right, and obtained that, I discovered that the planted folks were off and running at 10x and even above and were quite happy about it (was a shock to me) and I also discovered that plenty of old experienced members were quite happy with 4x turnover and that you might, quite legitimately, want tanks with a different "feel" to the current, once you got on out there in the hobby. 5x has done me pretty well though and I don't feel too far behind in the planted side of things although I'm not yet serious about it --- so what I'm saying is that given you must come to some decision, I agree that 5x is a pretty reasonable starting point.

Its also my feeling that excellent regular maintenance and gentle handling can help make almost any of these cannister machines do well for you. I give Eheim and Rena a slight edge and I'd put Tetratec right there too except for hearing of a few breakage problems (although any of them probably has these if you look back far enough.) Despite more reports of problems with Fluval cannisters, there are still lots and lots of serious hobbyists using those too. If you are close to thinking ProII then I suspect you wouldn't go wrong (again, I'd steer clear of the thermo because of the sensor problem and I'd always go upward a model if I were on the borderline between two models, unless perhaps it was an expensive change of model lines.)

~~waterdrop~~
 

Most reactions

Back
Top