There is still no true crossover; you do not get a BSAC qualification based on another agency's teachings, merely a guidance for where you should start BSAC training. That may be a pedantic view of the word but it is the opinion of the BSAC council members and various DOs on the BSAC forum.
Not as far as I was told when I chatted to the local club, it's 32 & 36 and my mate has just joined them as OW to do the OD training and has been told he will be trained in 32 & 36, but again the point is the two courses differ. Yes you could do the advanced nitrox with BSAC, but I'd prefer to go for TDI AN if I was doing that (not that I have any intention) and have 21-99%.
Ah, I misunderstood you. For OD it is 32 or 36 on air tables. For SD it is at least 27, 32 or 36 on BSAC nitrox tables though I have a feeling it may be anything in between 21 and 36. I thought (as we were discussing crossing towards the SD level) that you meant the SD nitrox level hence my added in bit on the 27%.
While I touch on tables, if anyone ever quotes the "tables are far more conservative than computers line" at you, try comparing a square profile 30m dive for 33minutes on a computer and the BSAC 88s. The tables come up with something like 3 minutes at 6m stops, the VR3 throws in a 2:40 deep stop at 18m and about 12-18minutes at 6m. I had heard the 88s were aggressive, but that seems crazy...
I am tempted by the TDI route, but for the cost of me doing that I could easily do advanced nitrox and extended range diving SDCs which have me in the same place (well, slightly further as the ERD gives accelerated deco which is a separate TDI course and more money).
But the point I was making is that the rescue skills done in PADI RD are classed as SD level (If I do RD I can crossover as SD, whereas if not I crossover as OD) whereas the skills on RD are better than those done at higher BSAC levels, again showing that the two do not operate on a level playing field. As I said, on YD forum there are many BSAC, SSI and even GUE instructors who feel that the RD is the best rescue course in the industry and are happy to recommend their students do the course, even if they consider the rest of the PADI courses to be inferior.
Having been a member of YD for a while, I am aware of this too
Also, being a member of a club with BSAC, TDI, SAA and rebreather instructors, I am all too aware of how good and respected the PADI RD course is, but you almost seemed to be claiming that it was bad that a PADI RD is only given SD equivalence because one aspect of diving (rescue) is equivalent to a higher level, despite fully knowing that many other elements are omitted.
I'm not picking inter agencies fights here Andy, I'll be joining BSAC soon enough and have no axe to grind with them, I am showing someone new to it all that the two just do not merge. AOW is in reality equal to OD, but with deeper limits, RD is equal to SD but with far superior rescue skills, but still lacks the deco and smb etc.
Nor I, and I am also pointing out that things are different. You seemed to be upset that you won't be able to dive past 20m as a BSAC diver when in reality your PADI limit of 30m will be respected in a club and thus you will be allowed to hit that level. This confused me somewhat so I thought I would make it clear that one can join BSAC and do the same diving they are used to.
I dare say a sat diver could do sat dives in a BSAC club so long as he could bring all the necessary gear to satisfy safe diving principles...
I'd like BSAC and co to recognise the existing skills formally and just do a top up course, for example they could do the rescue, smb, line laying and deco stuff to get an AOW to SD.
Many people wish that too. There is much debate on how the SALT system could be tweaked to be very good at grabbing PADI divers that want to join BSAC, especially to allow a "short course" to bring PADI DM up to BSAC DL deco standards. Mind you, once you are doing the bits covered in SD that aren't (or might not be) covered in AOW you aren't far off doing the whole qualification (rescue, smb, dsmb, distance line, decompression, gas planning, partial pressures, nitrox use).
After all they are charging me £60 extra "crossover" fee, it'd be nice if they had specific literature and course syllabus for that money. It woud also make it easier and more attractive for more people to join them.
That fee is a club based one. Our club charges no such fee. The only standard fee charged by BSAC is the £47 per year. Any other costs are down to the individual club.
I will agree again though, some form of more formal crossover with a pack of some sort would be nice, though I understand that once you begin training for the next level you should get something which tells you the bits you have "missed" in previous BSAC quals. Not massively important when entering SD, but important for the DM that starts AD.