Echinodorus
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2008
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi, I'm Echinodorus. I'm new.
I have a theory.
I have noticed that the hardiness of some popular fish seems to be declining. For example: once you bought guppies as fish that would survive anything. Now they come in all sorts of wonderful colours but at the price of dying at every little hiccough. Angels come in all different colour varietis but a really good pair of true breeding and hardy angels is getting hard to find.
I believe it is due to careless inbreeding.
I want to breed angels 'backwards'. This is, I will select the young angels that prove to be the most colour true of the wildtype. I hope that in breeding back to the wildtype (and carefully avoiding inbreeding) I will strengthen my line.
Have you noted the flaw in the reasoning yet? I say that by breeding for wildtype colour I can regain hardiness. The assumption is thus that wildtype is linked to 'hardiness'. Of course there is no one 'hardiness gene' and a wildtype angel isn't necessarily hardy.
It is a rather weak speculation without concrete scientific base but somehow I think that since the original angels were hardy fish and wildtype and newer angels tend to be weaker fish, but in different colour varieties, that if I breed for wildtype I will automatically breed good hardiness. This because a colour variation is technically a mutation so maybe other genes on the same chromosome have mutated as well (not visable to phenotype). So if I breed for wildtype I will more likely get fish who's other genes on the same colour chromosome have not changed from the original.
My question is: does anyone know if there is a correlation between the colouring of angels and their general health or is my theory doomed to fail?
Also: does anyone know the long term effect of 'crossing over' in the cell meiosis phase. I realise this will jumble the genes of pure wildtype and colour-bred variety but I don't know how great the effect has been in the overal population. If it has been too large then my above reasning is void as there would be no more reason to assume a link between wildtype and 'hardiness'
N.B Don't say: the term 'hardiness' is vague. I realise that. A hardy fish is one that survives stuff (transport...water changes...e.ct). And I know some angels survive more stuff than others, so hardiness exists.
N.B If you can't help me with my question, I'd like to hear comments anyway. It's my second post on a forum ever and i'm still learning the rules.
Thanks!
I have a theory.
I have noticed that the hardiness of some popular fish seems to be declining. For example: once you bought guppies as fish that would survive anything. Now they come in all sorts of wonderful colours but at the price of dying at every little hiccough. Angels come in all different colour varietis but a really good pair of true breeding and hardy angels is getting hard to find.
I believe it is due to careless inbreeding.
I want to breed angels 'backwards'. This is, I will select the young angels that prove to be the most colour true of the wildtype. I hope that in breeding back to the wildtype (and carefully avoiding inbreeding) I will strengthen my line.
Have you noted the flaw in the reasoning yet? I say that by breeding for wildtype colour I can regain hardiness. The assumption is thus that wildtype is linked to 'hardiness'. Of course there is no one 'hardiness gene' and a wildtype angel isn't necessarily hardy.
It is a rather weak speculation without concrete scientific base but somehow I think that since the original angels were hardy fish and wildtype and newer angels tend to be weaker fish, but in different colour varieties, that if I breed for wildtype I will automatically breed good hardiness. This because a colour variation is technically a mutation so maybe other genes on the same chromosome have mutated as well (not visable to phenotype). So if I breed for wildtype I will more likely get fish who's other genes on the same colour chromosome have not changed from the original.
My question is: does anyone know if there is a correlation between the colouring of angels and their general health or is my theory doomed to fail?
Also: does anyone know the long term effect of 'crossing over' in the cell meiosis phase. I realise this will jumble the genes of pure wildtype and colour-bred variety but I don't know how great the effect has been in the overal population. If it has been too large then my above reasning is void as there would be no more reason to assume a link between wildtype and 'hardiness'
N.B Don't say: the term 'hardiness' is vague. I realise that. A hardy fish is one that survives stuff (transport...water changes...e.ct). And I know some angels survive more stuff than others, so hardiness exists.
N.B If you can't help me with my question, I'd like to hear comments anyway. It's my second post on a forum ever and i'm still learning the rules.
Thanks!