yes it is the same as agassizii double red but the Agassizii ampiyacu is the wild form named after where it is found in peru, it is not as quite as colourful.
check out this site lists them all http/sites.no/slekt.asp?slekt=Apistogramma
been abit anoraky and done some research
Angel
What we regard nowadays as double red, triple red etc are all line bred colour morphs (both with aggies and cac's). Although they would have had wild ancestors, they are now well and truly domesticated.
The big problem we face with wild caught Apisto's just now is that everytime we catch a fish with a slight colour variation, the collection location (or similar) is added after the name giving the impression it is possibly a new species, and when you consider the colour variation within the populations, this makes it (in my opinion) even more farsical!!!.
As mentioned above, A. agassizii 'Ampiyacu' is a wild fish from Peru, given the variation in colours of the various wild populations (anything from reds and oranges through to various shades of blue), it's anyones guess as to where the domesticated 'double red' strains originated from.
In a sense, yes, they are man made. The fish have been line bred and with each succesive generation we have been selecting the most colourful individuals to enhance the trait. Now whether this is for double red, triple red etc, it's still the same, it's an aquarium derived colour strain.
We've had all these colour variations with the Apisto cacatuoides for a long time now, the Apisto agassizii colour variants have been over in Germany for a while and they are now feeding through into the UK hobby so they are still relatively new to us. Below are a couple of links to 'aquarium strains' of aggies (courtesy of Mark Breeze):