three-fingers
Fish Connoisseur
EXIF data 
. Also, don't bother at all with the digital zoom on the phone (data says you used 2.640x), it just effectively crops the picture then makes it bigger again - losing a lot of valuable detail for an ID. Just upload the photo as large as you can without lessening quality and let us zoom in ourself, or crop it on photobuckets image editor.
I'd stick the ISO to 400 (or 500 if you can set it to that) as this is probably best for the light situation by any higher on a phones small image sensor would make the images far too grainy.
Your phone is a better camera than my point and shoot
.
I was thinking Neocaridina palmata too, but wanted closer pics because I only know N.palmata from pictures (don't have any myself) so I amn't great at recognising them.
I was thinking it could have also been Caridina cf. babaulti - the eyes didn't look right (more N.palmata like) but an in-focus side profile would show the rostrum well enough to tell for sure .
. Also, don't bother at all with the digital zoom on the phone (data says you used 2.640x), it just effectively crops the picture then makes it bigger again - losing a lot of valuable detail for an ID. Just upload the photo as large as you can without lessening quality and let us zoom in ourself, or crop it on photobuckets image editor.I'd stick the ISO to 400 (or 500 if you can set it to that) as this is probably best for the light situation by any higher on a phones small image sensor would make the images far too grainy.
Your phone is a better camera than my point and shoot
.I was thinking Neocaridina palmata too, but wanted closer pics because I only know N.palmata from pictures (don't have any myself) so I amn't great at recognising them.
I was thinking it could have also been Caridina cf. babaulti - the eyes didn't look right (more N.palmata like) but an in-focus side profile would show the rostrum well enough to tell for sure
.
