saz326
Fish Herder
I have been looking after a sickly fishy and started to pay more attention to the analysis of the foods I am feeding my troop of swimming fanatics (community aquarium - Keyhole, Bolivian rams, various tetra, Cory cats).
I am confused.
vegetables are vegetables. They are mostly water, carbohydrates (sugars and starches), vitamins etc.
Meat is meat. Proteins, Water, sugars, fats.
How can a vegetable flake be 46% protein and 12% oil, and be claimed to be a vegetable flake?
Tetra Pro Vegetable:
Protein : 46% , Oil : 12% , Fibre : 3% , Ash : 11% , Moisture : 8%
Is it simply that less than 46% of the food is protien thus they can claim the bulk ingredient is veg? Perhaps the protein is not from a meat source?
If 46% is protein, the oil is probably linked to the protein (fish and fish derivitives), so veg could only be 32% of the mix?
Aaarrrggghhhhhhh!
edited - spellings. (there are probably more that are incorrect too)
I am confused.
vegetables are vegetables. They are mostly water, carbohydrates (sugars and starches), vitamins etc.
Meat is meat. Proteins, Water, sugars, fats.
How can a vegetable flake be 46% protein and 12% oil, and be claimed to be a vegetable flake?
Tetra Pro Vegetable:
Protein : 46% , Oil : 12% , Fibre : 3% , Ash : 11% , Moisture : 8%
Is it simply that less than 46% of the food is protien thus they can claim the bulk ingredient is veg? Perhaps the protein is not from a meat source?
If 46% is protein, the oil is probably linked to the protein (fish and fish derivitives), so veg could only be 32% of the mix?
Aaarrrggghhhhhhh!
edited - spellings. (there are probably more that are incorrect too)