snotirl said:
Isn't it an awful lot of work doing a complete tank strip-down every week?
Nope and its every 2 weeks why wouldnt i have to do that if i was to cycle??
Because unless you practically sterilise the tank every week or whatever you cannot prevent it from cycling - cycling just happens. It's the process whereby the beneficial bacteria build up. Unless you're somehow killing them off, of course?
I notice from your sig that you have three pretty heavily stocked tanks. It would be impossible to keep them healthy if those tanks weren't cycled, in other words, if the beneficial bacteria hadn't grown in them. You said your oldest fish is 11 years old. I presume that isn't a betta (or you have the world record) and any other tropical fish would need a cycled tank to survive that long.
"Cycling" isn't some technological process that you have to "do" to a tank, its the name given to what happens in nature. A natural pond, for instance, is "cycled" - it has the beneficial bacteria growing in the mud, but no human being has deliberately cycled it!
If you are doing a total strip down every fortnight you are wasting your time and risking your fish since a fortnight is plenty of time for an uncycled tank to have a massive ammonia spike, followed by a massive nitrite spike. You'd be far better off to change a small amount of water daily for a couple of weeks and let the tank cycle. But my suspicion is that you don't do that.
If you're doing 100% water changes every fortnight that is also risky and pointless since it may kill off beneficial bacteria (although most are in the gravel and filter) and would stress your fish having to catch them and keep them in a bucket once a fortnight. You'd be much better off doing a 50% water change every fortnight and leaving the fish where they are, plus it would be a lot less work.