Background
So, I'm an ecologist and, more importantly, a pedant. I originally started out brainstorming for a 20gal long setup with the goal of having a nice, lush, heavily planted tank with fish that simply looked good together. This is a sane and normal way to plan a tank.
So anyway, I've decided to do a biotope tank featuring the Ucayali River of Peru.
Specifically, a small, shallow, slow-moving tributary of the Ucayali. This will be a log of my journey in setting up and maintaining this tank.
Tank
As mentioned, a good old classic 20 long! Thank you, man on FB marketplace who's downsizing and selling old tanks for $1/gal. I originally was going to go for a 20 high since I could get one for free, and I might still grab one (a free tank is a free tank, after all), but for this project, I think the greater horizontal space is going to be much better. Heating will be provided by two 50W Eheim Jager heaters. I'll be using sponge filters for that nice, gentle flow. Probably two of them, each rated for 20 gallons. Always nice to have more filtration capacity than needed. Does mean I'll have to get creative with scaping to hide them though. Sponge filters are great, but they aren't the prettiest things...
Abiotics (substrate, hardscape, chemistry)
In the slow-moving tributaries of the Ucayali, the substrate is basically exclusively fine, white sand. I could use CaribSea, but it's a little pricey and a bit coarse for the bottom-dwellers I plan to have. So, I'm going to go with pool filter sand instead. It's a little pricier than play sand, but with pool filter sand, I can get the light off-white color I'm looking for (and I hear it tends to be a little cleaner than play sand).
Of course, we can't forget the hallmark of slow-moving waters of the Amazon Basin... leaf litter! I'm hoping to collect a lot of this myself. I know a spot in the woods where there's always a really nice carpet of dead brown rhododendron leaves. To me, they look very tropical, especially when compared to deciduous leaves like oak. I've heard though that evergreens can be kind of iffy in terms of tank safety? Rhododendrons are in the Laurel family, so technically evergreen, but not conifers. If anyone has more information on this, I'd be happy to hear it. May also pick up a few indian almond leaves and other appropriate botanicals for better color.
Also hoping to collect a lot of my own driftwood for this. I'm lucky to live by the ocean, so we have an abundance of it. Of course, anything I collect will be boiled to hell and back, don't worry. I may still buy a couple pieces to replicate branches and small tree root structures, since most of our ocean driftwood is single chunks of smooth wood. Also planning on adding a couple pieces of really nice petrified wood I have laying around.
Lastly, I'm grateful to live in a place with very, very soft water. We don't have carbonate rock basically anywhere in my state, so the GH never gets above 50ppm. In my specific area, it's closer to 20ppm. Extremely lucky on this front. My tap water's pH sits pretty comfortably at 7.2, and I even found some old state-collected water quality data from 2013 that also put the water in my area at 7.2! Neat! I've tried to select for species that will tolerate this pH, although there's one (who shall be revealed later) that can't really handle pH above 7.0, so I'm going to see what the tank pH ends up being after the botanicals are added. They should bring it down enough, but if they don't, I have an alternative fish in mind that can handle up to 7.5.
Plants
So, as I'm sure many of you know, the whole deal with this type of ecosystem is leaf litter, leaf litter, and more leaf litter. Doesn't really leave a whole lot of room for plants in the substrate. Pictures of the substrate taken by Tom Christoffersen on his trip to the Ucayali back in 2009 show no live plants at all. That said... I'll probably plant one or two amazon swords (Echinodorus amazonicus) towards the back or side of the tank. I can just say we're right at the water's edge, how about that.
Although I don't have many options for rooted plants, I get to go crazy wild with floaters! The Ucayali apparently regularly has two or more species of floating plants coexisting, which I understand is somewhat uncommon in a lot of areas. I'll be primarily using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) and amazon frogbit (Limnobium laevigatum). These are nice, fast growers and will be great for silent cycling the tank, I think. At some point, I'll probably try to corral them with floating rings if I can find or make some, just to let a bit of light into the tank.
Livestock
Oh boy, here we go. Researching livestock is really what led me down the rabbithole of biotope aquariums. Here are my eventual plans for a completed tank:
1x Apistogramma agassizii (this is the pH guy... Will substitute a cacatuoides if I can't get the tank pH low enough with botanicals)
8x Neon tetra (Paracheirodon innesi)
6x Marbled hatchetfish (Carnegiella strigata)
4x Zebra oto (Otocinclus cocama)
Inverts?? (please advise)
This stocking level is listed as 76% on AqAdvisor, and since I'll be letting the tank adjust with multiple small additions of fish, I think I feel comfortable with this level. That said, this tank won't be very heavily planted, so I may add or substract depending on how my tank responds and how much I feel it can handle. I am seeking advice on stocking order though. Would it be better to get the apisto first so it has a chance to settle in and claim a territory, or would the fact that it'd be the first fish in the tank make it a bit feistier with the subsequent tankmates? I know apistos aren't known to be especially aggressive, and since I'm not planning on getting a pair (so no brooding), I don't think it'll ultimately be much of an issue, but I'll look into it more. I was planning on getting the apisto last, mostly since I want the tank to be mature and stable beforehand, but I can change that if need be. To my knowledge, it should be fine with the otos given plenty of hiding spaces. Another reason why a 20 long is better, for more floor space.
The inverts I'm a little stumped on. I think it would be great to have a couple snails or shrimp as a CUC, but in trying to stick with the biological accuracy, I would want inverts ideally native to the Ucayali, or at least the upper Amazon Basin. However, I've heard that there are basically no Amazonian inverts available in the hobby... Is this true? I haven't been able to find any for sale myself, but maybe one of you has more knowledge on this.
---
Well, that's basically my entire current plan laid out, I think! I'm very excited for this tank. I definitely wanted an Amazon community tank, but felt unfulfilled by the idea of a pan-Amazonian look or the typical Rio Negro biotope.
If anyone has any tips or advice, they will be very welcome. I'll keep this journal updated as I start collecting hardware and putting this whole thing together.
So, I'm an ecologist and, more importantly, a pedant. I originally started out brainstorming for a 20gal long setup with the goal of having a nice, lush, heavily planted tank with fish that simply looked good together. This is a sane and normal way to plan a tank.
So anyway, I've decided to do a biotope tank featuring the Ucayali River of Peru.
Specifically, a small, shallow, slow-moving tributary of the Ucayali. This will be a log of my journey in setting up and maintaining this tank.
Tank
As mentioned, a good old classic 20 long! Thank you, man on FB marketplace who's downsizing and selling old tanks for $1/gal. I originally was going to go for a 20 high since I could get one for free, and I might still grab one (a free tank is a free tank, after all), but for this project, I think the greater horizontal space is going to be much better. Heating will be provided by two 50W Eheim Jager heaters. I'll be using sponge filters for that nice, gentle flow. Probably two of them, each rated for 20 gallons. Always nice to have more filtration capacity than needed. Does mean I'll have to get creative with scaping to hide them though. Sponge filters are great, but they aren't the prettiest things...
Abiotics (substrate, hardscape, chemistry)
In the slow-moving tributaries of the Ucayali, the substrate is basically exclusively fine, white sand. I could use CaribSea, but it's a little pricey and a bit coarse for the bottom-dwellers I plan to have. So, I'm going to go with pool filter sand instead. It's a little pricier than play sand, but with pool filter sand, I can get the light off-white color I'm looking for (and I hear it tends to be a little cleaner than play sand).
Of course, we can't forget the hallmark of slow-moving waters of the Amazon Basin... leaf litter! I'm hoping to collect a lot of this myself. I know a spot in the woods where there's always a really nice carpet of dead brown rhododendron leaves. To me, they look very tropical, especially when compared to deciduous leaves like oak. I've heard though that evergreens can be kind of iffy in terms of tank safety? Rhododendrons are in the Laurel family, so technically evergreen, but not conifers. If anyone has more information on this, I'd be happy to hear it. May also pick up a few indian almond leaves and other appropriate botanicals for better color.
Also hoping to collect a lot of my own driftwood for this. I'm lucky to live by the ocean, so we have an abundance of it. Of course, anything I collect will be boiled to hell and back, don't worry. I may still buy a couple pieces to replicate branches and small tree root structures, since most of our ocean driftwood is single chunks of smooth wood. Also planning on adding a couple pieces of really nice petrified wood I have laying around.
Lastly, I'm grateful to live in a place with very, very soft water. We don't have carbonate rock basically anywhere in my state, so the GH never gets above 50ppm. In my specific area, it's closer to 20ppm. Extremely lucky on this front. My tap water's pH sits pretty comfortably at 7.2, and I even found some old state-collected water quality data from 2013 that also put the water in my area at 7.2! Neat! I've tried to select for species that will tolerate this pH, although there's one (who shall be revealed later) that can't really handle pH above 7.0, so I'm going to see what the tank pH ends up being after the botanicals are added. They should bring it down enough, but if they don't, I have an alternative fish in mind that can handle up to 7.5.
Plants
So, as I'm sure many of you know, the whole deal with this type of ecosystem is leaf litter, leaf litter, and more leaf litter. Doesn't really leave a whole lot of room for plants in the substrate. Pictures of the substrate taken by Tom Christoffersen on his trip to the Ucayali back in 2009 show no live plants at all. That said... I'll probably plant one or two amazon swords (Echinodorus amazonicus) towards the back or side of the tank. I can just say we're right at the water's edge, how about that.
Although I don't have many options for rooted plants, I get to go crazy wild with floaters! The Ucayali apparently regularly has two or more species of floating plants coexisting, which I understand is somewhat uncommon in a lot of areas. I'll be primarily using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) and amazon frogbit (Limnobium laevigatum). These are nice, fast growers and will be great for silent cycling the tank, I think. At some point, I'll probably try to corral them with floating rings if I can find or make some, just to let a bit of light into the tank.
Livestock
Oh boy, here we go. Researching livestock is really what led me down the rabbithole of biotope aquariums. Here are my eventual plans for a completed tank:
1x Apistogramma agassizii (this is the pH guy... Will substitute a cacatuoides if I can't get the tank pH low enough with botanicals)
8x Neon tetra (Paracheirodon innesi)
6x Marbled hatchetfish (Carnegiella strigata)
4x Zebra oto (Otocinclus cocama)
Inverts?? (please advise)
This stocking level is listed as 76% on AqAdvisor, and since I'll be letting the tank adjust with multiple small additions of fish, I think I feel comfortable with this level. That said, this tank won't be very heavily planted, so I may add or substract depending on how my tank responds and how much I feel it can handle. I am seeking advice on stocking order though. Would it be better to get the apisto first so it has a chance to settle in and claim a territory, or would the fact that it'd be the first fish in the tank make it a bit feistier with the subsequent tankmates? I know apistos aren't known to be especially aggressive, and since I'm not planning on getting a pair (so no brooding), I don't think it'll ultimately be much of an issue, but I'll look into it more. I was planning on getting the apisto last, mostly since I want the tank to be mature and stable beforehand, but I can change that if need be. To my knowledge, it should be fine with the otos given plenty of hiding spaces. Another reason why a 20 long is better, for more floor space.
The inverts I'm a little stumped on. I think it would be great to have a couple snails or shrimp as a CUC, but in trying to stick with the biological accuracy, I would want inverts ideally native to the Ucayali, or at least the upper Amazon Basin. However, I've heard that there are basically no Amazonian inverts available in the hobby... Is this true? I haven't been able to find any for sale myself, but maybe one of you has more knowledge on this.
---
Well, that's basically my entire current plan laid out, I think! I'm very excited for this tank. I definitely wanted an Amazon community tank, but felt unfulfilled by the idea of a pan-Amazonian look or the typical Rio Negro biotope.
If anyone has any tips or advice, they will be very welcome. I'll keep this journal updated as I start collecting hardware and putting this whole thing together.
Last edited: