The February FOTM Contest Poll is open!
🏆 Click to vote! 🏆
None of those fish is really "sensitive" (i.e. needing of a mature tank), so I would say all at once would be fine... ONLY IF you're fishless cycling properly, not overstocking, and have adequate filtration.
What fishless cycle process are you using?
What filter are you using?
What tank size?
What is your stocking plan (how many of each)?
None of those fish is really "sensitive" (i.e. needing of a mature tank), so I would say all at once would be fine... ONLY IF you're fishless cycling properly, not overstocking, and have adequate filtration.
What fishless cycle process are you using?
What filter are you using?
What tank size?
What is your stocking plan (how many of each)?
I don't think you're dangerously overstocking or anything, but you don't give yourself a lot of leeway. Personally, I would do 4 things to make sure everything worked out for the best:Typo i meant 4 ppm
I dont think its over stocking
many people have said this is fine.. (and not just pet stores also friends that have kept tanks for years...)
what do you other people think??
If you do a proper fishless cycle, you should add ALL your fish at once. Otherwise you will defeat the purpose of the cycling process. If you only add half your fish, some of your bacteria will die off since there isn't enough waste/ammonia to keep them fed. Then when you do add more fish, you will end up with a mini cycle.
The point of the fishless cycle is that when it's done, you've already built up that bacteria well beyond the needs of even your fully stocked tank. The only reason you wouldn't fully stock would be that you want to include a more sensitive fish into your mix, like otos or blue rams, that prefer a mature tank. In that case, you stock everything else, give the tank 4-6 months, and then add them.so did i...
Actually i thought you were supposed to... to let the bacteria grow with the fish population.. Is this wrong?