neon_platy
Fish Crazy
This was first article I read on goodeids when i was trying to figure out which ones to get. It's posted on several websites like ALA. Thought I'd post here in case anyone else wants to read about goodeids...
THE LOST TREASURE OF THE AZTECS
by James K. Langhammer
(This is an article originally written in 1976 and published in TROPIC TANK TALK
of GDAS and in LIVEBEARERS of ALA. It was revised in 1982, and again in 1999.
It is the first part of a series by the same title.)
History books tell us that in the early 1500s the Spanish Conquistadors destroyed, as a political entity at least, the great nation of the Aztecs in the central highlands of Mexico. In their relentless search for gold and other treasures, the Spaniards pillaged the American cultures until one by one most of them fell beneath Spanish domination. Yet history also alludes to the fact that the New World's ultimate treasures as envisioned by the Spaniards were never found. Why? Where were they hidden - and by whom?
Perhaps, the real treasures of the Aztec empire were hidden to the Europeans by their own inconsummate greed, and have continued so to this day! Gold and gem-stone ornaments were probably more beautiful than valuable to the Aztec people whose artifacts reflect the great majesty of the natural world around them.
Part of the beautiful baubles of the everyday world of the Aztecs still shimmer in the hot sun of the Tropic of Cancer, vicariously reflecting the Sun-god's radiance off their animate flanks in a brilliant blend of opalescence and pigmentation, and STILL are unknown and unappreciated by the modern world! - the Goodeids, a fascinating family of livebearing fishes.
The family Goodeidae is restricted to the ancient Aztec domain of west-central Mexico. Using the state capitals of Durango, Colima, Morelia, Mexico City, Queretaro, and San Luis Potosi as boundary references, the total range of the family which consists of approximately 36 species in 17 genera can be roughly circumscribed.
Goodeids are wonderfully interesting fishes, I don't believe any amount of paraphrasing on my part could improve on what John Michael Fitzsimons (1972) says about the family:
“The Goodeidae comprises a wholly Mexican family of viviparous freshwater fishes represented by 35 or more species largely restricted to the highlands of Mesa Central. Its focus of abundance is in the Rio Lerma basin where it is the dominant family of fishes (Miller and Fitzsimons, 1971).
“Goodeids are generally small; members of two genera, Alloophorus Hubbs and Turner and Goodea Jordan, attain a length of 200 mm, but most grow no larger than 100 mm. They live in a variety of habitats, ranging from deep spring-fed pools to shallow riffles. Some are lake dwellers: others abound in irrigation ditches that may have only a few inches of water. Their body form often reflects habitat type. Certain river and stream species, such as the Ilyodon Eigenmann, are swift swimmers with slim, streamlined bodies and large caudal fins. In ponds, lakes, or quiet stream pools, deep-bodied forms, such as Skiffia Meek, are slow moving and maneuver easily in dense vegetation, sculling with the pectoral fins in a manner reminiscent of many resident coral-reef fishes. Members of the genus Allodontichthys Hubbs and Turner look and behave like North American darters (Ethiostomatinae), are long-bodied bottom dwellers, and are found only among the rocks and boulders in shallow riffles. Goodeids include all consumer types: carnivores with conic teeth and a short gut, Alloophorus; herbivores with generalized bifid teeth and a long coiled gut, Ameca Miller and Fitzsimons; or omnivores with variable teeth and gut form, Xenotoca Hubbs and Turner, the feeding habits of which range from nearly completely carnivorous to completely herbivorous at different localities.
“The unifying features of the family are related to mode of reproduction - internal fertilization and live birth. The distinctive modification of the male anal fin, presence of an internal muscular organ of apparent reproductive function in the male, structure of the ovary, and the development of trophotaenia in embryos distinguish the Goodeidae from all other cyprinodontoid fishes. The first six or seven rays of the male anal fin are crowded, shortened, and often separated from the rest of the fin by a distinct notch; they probably aid in insemination. The anterior anal rays of the male have been described as a “gonopodium” (Turner, Mendoza, and Reiter, 1962), a term first applied to the elongate male anal fin of the poeciliids, but this term may be a misnomer for goodeids since the role of the anal fin in sperm intromission has not been demonstrated (Miller and Fitzsimons, 1971). Goodeid males also have a short, highly muscular tube connecting the sperm ducts to the genital opening; this structure has been termed a “pseudophallus” (Mohsen, 1961, 1965). It is said to expel semen forcibly or to become everted and applied to or placed into the female's genital opening, but, as with the “gonopodium”, its function has only been surmised and not demonstrated. Females have a single median ovary formed from the union of lateral organ rudiments, the fused internal walls of which form the median septum. Yolk is resorbed early in embryogeny and its nutritive function is assumed by placenta-like trophotaeniae, rosette or ribbon-like growths which extend from the anal region of developing embryos in all but one species (Turner, 1933, 1937)” - end of Fitzsimons quote.
Since 1972 when Fitzsimons wrote the above, one major systematic change affecting his words was Parenti’s 1981 revision of the family Goodeidae to include two egg-laying genera within a new subgenus Empetrichthyinae. Currently I believe all taxonomists accept Parenti’s conclusion that the egg-laying genera Empetrichthys and Crenichthys are indeed similar to what primitive goodeids must have been like and that by including them into the family its range is now extended north of Mexico’s boundaries.
My primary purpose in writing this account is to introduce to aquarists several species of the live-bearing goodeids and my impression as to their value as aquarium fishes.
The first species I'd like to mention is my unquestioned favorite - the Rainbow Goodeid, Characodon lateralis. I know of few fish with more color in wild stock than the Rainbow Goodeid; with judicious selection I believe this species can afford aquarists with at least as many colorful strains as have the platies and swordtails. Males are primarily red with yellow, green, black, and brown markings. It is true of all goodeids and many fishes generally that body pigmentation may be enhanced by iridescence reflected from light sources back to the viewer - resulting in visual splendor not seen if the fish are viewed in poorly lighted situations. Rainbows are peaceful with other fishes -although as with all goodeids some fin-nipping of other fishes seems to occur if the goodeids are not regularly fed well. Generally goodeids do not cannibalize their own young unless the parents are inadequately fed and maintained; thus multiple generations are easily exhibited together. Goodeid species should be housed separately, however, since some interspecific hybridization has been documented (Fitzsimons, 1972).
Rainbows can grow to 60 mm total length. Like all goodeids, they are not fussy eaters; although morphological details indicate many goodeids are adapted to herbivorous diets, my experience has been that they all relish and even prefer living animal foods.
The Rainbows are the most northern known viviparous goodeid and occur in springfed streams near Durango. Perhaps, their occurrence in the clean artesian waters explains their extreme inability to tolerate “old” water - they MUST have frequent water changes to offset the acidifying, polluting effect of metabolic wastes. In my Detroit water with pH of about 7.2 and 120 ppm of carbonate, a downward shift in pH can quickly become fatal to goodeids. I imagine hard, alkaline waters are much more to their well-being.
My partiality to the Rainbow fortunately, doesn't diminish my opinion that the best of all aquarium goodeids is the Butterfly Goodeid, Ameca splendens. Like a giant Nothobranchius, the Butterfly's beautiful colors and frenetic activity will endear it to most hobbyists. The female Butterfly is basically a black and brown variegated version of the male, which displays true elegance. The males have iridescent green flanks which are flashed like a spinning prism as the fish darts around the aquarium. The caudal fin is widespread at all times, providing magnificent contrast between the broad black submarginal band and its wide border of canary yellow.
Butterfly Goodeids are large fish growing to 100 mm, with some of the largest newborn babies I've seen among bony fishes - 20 to 24 mm at birth! They are peaceful and seem more tolerant of old water than most goodeids are.
The Blue-tailed Goodeid, Ataeniobius toweri, has little to recommend it in my opinion. It is a slender fish growing to 100 mm. On the flanks are two parallel, horizontal stripes and in the male the caudal fin is a beautiful pastel blue by reflected light. The Blue-tailed Goodeid is sensitive to water quality. It is the most easterly of all goodeids and it alone lacks the well-developed trophotaeniae so characteristic of goodeids; for that reason it was once considered the most primitive member of the family. Recent research suggests instead that the trophotaeniae were lost as Ataeniobius evolved from the genus Goodea. It is one of the few species in which I cannot see sexual dimorphism at birth; visible anal-fin modification in males seems to occur at about 30 mm.
The Green Goodeid, Xenoophorus captivus, is another that will never be popular. It was my first goodeid and I have maintained stock for over thirty years and freely distributed the fish, but I know of few other hobby stocks at present. This is too bad because it is a desert species and due to local irrigation uses, its spring habitats are rapidly being destroyed. It simply will not tolerate old acidic water and dies quickly if neglected. The males have iridescent green bodies and a rather unremarkable cream border on the otherwise transparent caudal fin. One population from Jesus Maria has better color over all and was only introduced into the hobby in 1998. The species seems to be large at 60 mm.
A colorful species is the Picotee Goodeid, which has a scientific name that is truly longer than its 40 mm adult size - Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis. This is an elegant species, very much like the Merry Widow, Phallichthys amates (Poeciliidae), in body shape and pattern. The dorsal and anal fins of males are picoted (or bordered) in orange which can be deepened to blood-red if enough carotenoids are fed to the fish; the caudal is colorless. The body of both sexes is boldly marked by large blotches. Behavior is spritely but peaceful. A more recent introduction and equally handsome is the Crescent Goodeid - Zoogoneticus tequila. It is slightly more robust but differs in fin coloration - its dorsal and anal fins are bordered by creamy bands and it is the caudal fin which is bordered by red-orange!
Just as the Mozambique mouthbrooder gave all Tilapia (sensu lato) a “black eye” or undesirable status for most aquarists , so also I'm afraid the Red-tailed Goodeid, Xenotoca eiseni has adversely affected the attitude of aquarists towards the other Goodeids. The Red-tail is a pugnacious, astonishingly fecund, hardy, and robust species which grows to 80 mm. and seems to quickly wear out it's welcome for most aquarists. Please, however, keep in mind that this fish is a rogue species and not at all typical of the family.
By contrast, the beautiful Jeweled Goodeid, Xenotoca variata, is highly desirable although I am afraid it is destined to be overshadowed by the very similar Butterfly Goodeid, Ameca splendens. The male Jeweled Goodeid has a “crazy quilt” effect of opalescence on its sides - pinks, greens, blues - which can only be appreciated by light reflected to the viewer. The creamy yellow tail border loses effect by not having a contrasting submarginal band. Like the Red-tail, it grows to 80 mm. but seems to be a much gentler and acceptable community fish.
With these not-so-brief and yet extremely superficial comments, I hope I have given you some insight to a relatively ignored and fascinating family of livebearers. For additional reading I refer you to the bibliography below.
Bibliography
1. Fitzsimons, J. M. 1972. A revision of two genera of Goodeid fishes from the Mexican plateau. Copeia 1972 (4):728-756
2. Hubbs C. L. and C. L. Turner. 1939. Studies of the fishes of the order Cyprinodontes. XVI. A revision of the Goodeidae. Miscellaneous Publications No. 42, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan: pp. 1-80.
3. Miller, R. R. and J. M. Fitzsimons. 1971. Ameca splendens, a new genus and species of Goodeid fish from western Mexico, with remarks on the classification of the Goodeidae. Copeia 1971 (1): pp. 1-13
4. Norton, J. N. 1981. Goodeids - Mexican livebearers. FAMA: October and November, 1981.
5. Parenti, L. R.. 1981. Phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of Cyprinodontiform fishes (Teleostei,
Atherinomorpha). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 168: Article 4, pp. 1-557.
6. Turner, C. L. 1946. A contribution to the taxonomy and zoogeography of the Goodeid fishes. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology No. 495, University of Michigan. pp. 1-13.
7. Webb, S. A. 1998. A phylogenetic analysis of the Goodeidae. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Michigan.
THE LOST TREASURE OF THE AZTECS
by James K. Langhammer
(This is an article originally written in 1976 and published in TROPIC TANK TALK
of GDAS and in LIVEBEARERS of ALA. It was revised in 1982, and again in 1999.
It is the first part of a series by the same title.)
History books tell us that in the early 1500s the Spanish Conquistadors destroyed, as a political entity at least, the great nation of the Aztecs in the central highlands of Mexico. In their relentless search for gold and other treasures, the Spaniards pillaged the American cultures until one by one most of them fell beneath Spanish domination. Yet history also alludes to the fact that the New World's ultimate treasures as envisioned by the Spaniards were never found. Why? Where were they hidden - and by whom?
Perhaps, the real treasures of the Aztec empire were hidden to the Europeans by their own inconsummate greed, and have continued so to this day! Gold and gem-stone ornaments were probably more beautiful than valuable to the Aztec people whose artifacts reflect the great majesty of the natural world around them.
Part of the beautiful baubles of the everyday world of the Aztecs still shimmer in the hot sun of the Tropic of Cancer, vicariously reflecting the Sun-god's radiance off their animate flanks in a brilliant blend of opalescence and pigmentation, and STILL are unknown and unappreciated by the modern world! - the Goodeids, a fascinating family of livebearing fishes.
The family Goodeidae is restricted to the ancient Aztec domain of west-central Mexico. Using the state capitals of Durango, Colima, Morelia, Mexico City, Queretaro, and San Luis Potosi as boundary references, the total range of the family which consists of approximately 36 species in 17 genera can be roughly circumscribed.
Goodeids are wonderfully interesting fishes, I don't believe any amount of paraphrasing on my part could improve on what John Michael Fitzsimons (1972) says about the family:
“The Goodeidae comprises a wholly Mexican family of viviparous freshwater fishes represented by 35 or more species largely restricted to the highlands of Mesa Central. Its focus of abundance is in the Rio Lerma basin where it is the dominant family of fishes (Miller and Fitzsimons, 1971).
“Goodeids are generally small; members of two genera, Alloophorus Hubbs and Turner and Goodea Jordan, attain a length of 200 mm, but most grow no larger than 100 mm. They live in a variety of habitats, ranging from deep spring-fed pools to shallow riffles. Some are lake dwellers: others abound in irrigation ditches that may have only a few inches of water. Their body form often reflects habitat type. Certain river and stream species, such as the Ilyodon Eigenmann, are swift swimmers with slim, streamlined bodies and large caudal fins. In ponds, lakes, or quiet stream pools, deep-bodied forms, such as Skiffia Meek, are slow moving and maneuver easily in dense vegetation, sculling with the pectoral fins in a manner reminiscent of many resident coral-reef fishes. Members of the genus Allodontichthys Hubbs and Turner look and behave like North American darters (Ethiostomatinae), are long-bodied bottom dwellers, and are found only among the rocks and boulders in shallow riffles. Goodeids include all consumer types: carnivores with conic teeth and a short gut, Alloophorus; herbivores with generalized bifid teeth and a long coiled gut, Ameca Miller and Fitzsimons; or omnivores with variable teeth and gut form, Xenotoca Hubbs and Turner, the feeding habits of which range from nearly completely carnivorous to completely herbivorous at different localities.
“The unifying features of the family are related to mode of reproduction - internal fertilization and live birth. The distinctive modification of the male anal fin, presence of an internal muscular organ of apparent reproductive function in the male, structure of the ovary, and the development of trophotaenia in embryos distinguish the Goodeidae from all other cyprinodontoid fishes. The first six or seven rays of the male anal fin are crowded, shortened, and often separated from the rest of the fin by a distinct notch; they probably aid in insemination. The anterior anal rays of the male have been described as a “gonopodium” (Turner, Mendoza, and Reiter, 1962), a term first applied to the elongate male anal fin of the poeciliids, but this term may be a misnomer for goodeids since the role of the anal fin in sperm intromission has not been demonstrated (Miller and Fitzsimons, 1971). Goodeid males also have a short, highly muscular tube connecting the sperm ducts to the genital opening; this structure has been termed a “pseudophallus” (Mohsen, 1961, 1965). It is said to expel semen forcibly or to become everted and applied to or placed into the female's genital opening, but, as with the “gonopodium”, its function has only been surmised and not demonstrated. Females have a single median ovary formed from the union of lateral organ rudiments, the fused internal walls of which form the median septum. Yolk is resorbed early in embryogeny and its nutritive function is assumed by placenta-like trophotaeniae, rosette or ribbon-like growths which extend from the anal region of developing embryos in all but one species (Turner, 1933, 1937)” - end of Fitzsimons quote.
Since 1972 when Fitzsimons wrote the above, one major systematic change affecting his words was Parenti’s 1981 revision of the family Goodeidae to include two egg-laying genera within a new subgenus Empetrichthyinae. Currently I believe all taxonomists accept Parenti’s conclusion that the egg-laying genera Empetrichthys and Crenichthys are indeed similar to what primitive goodeids must have been like and that by including them into the family its range is now extended north of Mexico’s boundaries.
My primary purpose in writing this account is to introduce to aquarists several species of the live-bearing goodeids and my impression as to their value as aquarium fishes.
The first species I'd like to mention is my unquestioned favorite - the Rainbow Goodeid, Characodon lateralis. I know of few fish with more color in wild stock than the Rainbow Goodeid; with judicious selection I believe this species can afford aquarists with at least as many colorful strains as have the platies and swordtails. Males are primarily red with yellow, green, black, and brown markings. It is true of all goodeids and many fishes generally that body pigmentation may be enhanced by iridescence reflected from light sources back to the viewer - resulting in visual splendor not seen if the fish are viewed in poorly lighted situations. Rainbows are peaceful with other fishes -although as with all goodeids some fin-nipping of other fishes seems to occur if the goodeids are not regularly fed well. Generally goodeids do not cannibalize their own young unless the parents are inadequately fed and maintained; thus multiple generations are easily exhibited together. Goodeid species should be housed separately, however, since some interspecific hybridization has been documented (Fitzsimons, 1972).
Rainbows can grow to 60 mm total length. Like all goodeids, they are not fussy eaters; although morphological details indicate many goodeids are adapted to herbivorous diets, my experience has been that they all relish and even prefer living animal foods.
The Rainbows are the most northern known viviparous goodeid and occur in springfed streams near Durango. Perhaps, their occurrence in the clean artesian waters explains their extreme inability to tolerate “old” water - they MUST have frequent water changes to offset the acidifying, polluting effect of metabolic wastes. In my Detroit water with pH of about 7.2 and 120 ppm of carbonate, a downward shift in pH can quickly become fatal to goodeids. I imagine hard, alkaline waters are much more to their well-being.
My partiality to the Rainbow fortunately, doesn't diminish my opinion that the best of all aquarium goodeids is the Butterfly Goodeid, Ameca splendens. Like a giant Nothobranchius, the Butterfly's beautiful colors and frenetic activity will endear it to most hobbyists. The female Butterfly is basically a black and brown variegated version of the male, which displays true elegance. The males have iridescent green flanks which are flashed like a spinning prism as the fish darts around the aquarium. The caudal fin is widespread at all times, providing magnificent contrast between the broad black submarginal band and its wide border of canary yellow.
Butterfly Goodeids are large fish growing to 100 mm, with some of the largest newborn babies I've seen among bony fishes - 20 to 24 mm at birth! They are peaceful and seem more tolerant of old water than most goodeids are.
The Blue-tailed Goodeid, Ataeniobius toweri, has little to recommend it in my opinion. It is a slender fish growing to 100 mm. On the flanks are two parallel, horizontal stripes and in the male the caudal fin is a beautiful pastel blue by reflected light. The Blue-tailed Goodeid is sensitive to water quality. It is the most easterly of all goodeids and it alone lacks the well-developed trophotaeniae so characteristic of goodeids; for that reason it was once considered the most primitive member of the family. Recent research suggests instead that the trophotaeniae were lost as Ataeniobius evolved from the genus Goodea. It is one of the few species in which I cannot see sexual dimorphism at birth; visible anal-fin modification in males seems to occur at about 30 mm.
The Green Goodeid, Xenoophorus captivus, is another that will never be popular. It was my first goodeid and I have maintained stock for over thirty years and freely distributed the fish, but I know of few other hobby stocks at present. This is too bad because it is a desert species and due to local irrigation uses, its spring habitats are rapidly being destroyed. It simply will not tolerate old acidic water and dies quickly if neglected. The males have iridescent green bodies and a rather unremarkable cream border on the otherwise transparent caudal fin. One population from Jesus Maria has better color over all and was only introduced into the hobby in 1998. The species seems to be large at 60 mm.
A colorful species is the Picotee Goodeid, which has a scientific name that is truly longer than its 40 mm adult size - Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis. This is an elegant species, very much like the Merry Widow, Phallichthys amates (Poeciliidae), in body shape and pattern. The dorsal and anal fins of males are picoted (or bordered) in orange which can be deepened to blood-red if enough carotenoids are fed to the fish; the caudal is colorless. The body of both sexes is boldly marked by large blotches. Behavior is spritely but peaceful. A more recent introduction and equally handsome is the Crescent Goodeid - Zoogoneticus tequila. It is slightly more robust but differs in fin coloration - its dorsal and anal fins are bordered by creamy bands and it is the caudal fin which is bordered by red-orange!
Just as the Mozambique mouthbrooder gave all Tilapia (sensu lato) a “black eye” or undesirable status for most aquarists , so also I'm afraid the Red-tailed Goodeid, Xenotoca eiseni has adversely affected the attitude of aquarists towards the other Goodeids. The Red-tail is a pugnacious, astonishingly fecund, hardy, and robust species which grows to 80 mm. and seems to quickly wear out it's welcome for most aquarists. Please, however, keep in mind that this fish is a rogue species and not at all typical of the family.
By contrast, the beautiful Jeweled Goodeid, Xenotoca variata, is highly desirable although I am afraid it is destined to be overshadowed by the very similar Butterfly Goodeid, Ameca splendens. The male Jeweled Goodeid has a “crazy quilt” effect of opalescence on its sides - pinks, greens, blues - which can only be appreciated by light reflected to the viewer. The creamy yellow tail border loses effect by not having a contrasting submarginal band. Like the Red-tail, it grows to 80 mm. but seems to be a much gentler and acceptable community fish.
With these not-so-brief and yet extremely superficial comments, I hope I have given you some insight to a relatively ignored and fascinating family of livebearers. For additional reading I refer you to the bibliography below.
Bibliography
1. Fitzsimons, J. M. 1972. A revision of two genera of Goodeid fishes from the Mexican plateau. Copeia 1972 (4):728-756
2. Hubbs C. L. and C. L. Turner. 1939. Studies of the fishes of the order Cyprinodontes. XVI. A revision of the Goodeidae. Miscellaneous Publications No. 42, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan: pp. 1-80.
3. Miller, R. R. and J. M. Fitzsimons. 1971. Ameca splendens, a new genus and species of Goodeid fish from western Mexico, with remarks on the classification of the Goodeidae. Copeia 1971 (1): pp. 1-13
4. Norton, J. N. 1981. Goodeids - Mexican livebearers. FAMA: October and November, 1981.
5. Parenti, L. R.. 1981. Phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of Cyprinodontiform fishes (Teleostei,
Atherinomorpha). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 168: Article 4, pp. 1-557.
6. Turner, C. L. 1946. A contribution to the taxonomy and zoogeography of the Goodeid fishes. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology No. 495, University of Michigan. pp. 1-13.
7. Webb, S. A. 1998. A phylogenetic analysis of the Goodeidae. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Michigan.
Well, he can be mine too- well written article and more inspiration for us all! 
btw at least two of my fems are pregos, and he said the green ones esp have large fry, so as soon as they drop, I'll try and get some good pics up on here
