Well, the Art of photography and video can be every bit of much as promotion of the hobby as it is in person in the local clubs.
Both are wise.
There is just no way to judge all the entrants equally among cultures, goals, all in person, nor based on a single manipulated photo.
I've never judged for a contest for such reasons.
However, a video of each tank would be better than a picture.
We have moved on and now have video format widely available, we watch TV, podcast, and youtube...............not read newspapers in many cases.
It's sort of "old time" to use photos IMO.
You also need to know what the real goal of the aquaristys was, how they came up with and what they sought for the tank.
Much like an artists discusses their works at a gallery showing.
The video took something away for me.
I'll ask everyone that sees the picture and then sees the video their honest opinion there.
I do think based on the photo's this year's contest was really fair and well placed, you have to place a lot of work and effort in these tanks.
ADA is looking for a particular layout and style here, few of the dutch tanks would place highly, however, the same is true of the ADA style within the NBAT set of judges as well
Ponder that. Both styles still evolved from traditional gardening styles, see any Japanese gardens, or European designs for gardens as well, they both where just applied to aquariums for designs.
But entering the ADA contest is available to anyone with a good photo.
Not so with NBAT........so ponder that as well............
Which are your own goals?
That's a more important question and one that will lead to a "new" style.
Regards,
Tom Barr